Seriously Contentious

[smshogun]

Before anyone even considers embarking on what I am about to write about I would advocate you do your own research into this and make your own decisions. I, and the site will not be liable for any consequences arising from this posting.

Do you pay utility bills? I don't.

Do you want to know how to avoid them legally? if so then carry on reading and UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING SAID before proceeding, what I will say is that myself and a large group have understood the system through fully researching it and understanding it and exploiting this knowledge to avoid paying utilities bills for gas and electricity.

When we look at law any natural resource is the property of us, its ours, so why do utility companies charge us for them?

They don't charge us for them as we are not charged for gas or electricity, WE ARE ONLY CHARGED FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF GAS AND ELECTRICITY and nothing else, the actual gas and electricity is free as we all own it, its ours to begin with. To understand the scams and lies we refer back to this basic fact and firstly we have to look back in history which shows us a nationalised gas and electricity industry which as we all know was owned by us the people and run and managed by the government on our behalf as we owned these commodities, to make money from them they had to sell our assets without our consent and find a way for the new owners to profit from them. To do this they deleted the wording "you only pay for the transportation of gas and electricity" from public eyes to make people believe they pay for what they use, we don't. Prior to privatisation it was one company divided into two parts, the distribution of gas and electricity called the national grid and the retailer of gas and electricity which was your regional provider such as East Midlands Electricity Board for electricity or East Midlands Gas, then British Gas; now it has moved onto the big 6 energy providers who we incorrectly assume are six different companies, they aren't.

British Gas is wholly owned by a company called Centrica and if you spend time researching you will see Centrica actually own not just British Gas outright but a controlling stake (51% +) in all the big 6 energy companies which immediately means they control them all; in addition to this the big 6 all own the smaller allegedly independents and they also own the former national grid now called Transco; but go to great lengths to hide it from the public. This immediately proves they own both the retail/wholesale gas sales as well as the entire transportation and distribution network and shows the claims about competition in the industry as pure unadulterated lies, and yes I have researched it and have over 2000 pages proving it.

When you sign up to an energy provider all you're doing is signing up to a Centrica owned company and Centrica set the prices and tariffs for all these companies solely to give the illusion of competition and its why one suddenly lowers their prices to attract customers who are astute and switch suppliers, they then change their tariffs after the qualifying period so everyone is paying around the same profit (not price) to each of these companies, basically they are price rigging and the Government know it and occasionally make a token gesture to get them to lower the prices to appease the public as they are doing now with an election coming up.

Part two of the scam is simple, all the energy companies which is the big 6 and alleged independents only pay Transco for transportation of the gas and they have to make a profit from all users for their numerous shareholders which is why Centrica sets each companies prices based on profitability of each company and not retail price. Transco can only ever supply to a retailer due to legislation and legal obligations and NOT directly to the public; so each of these gas suppliers pays Transco only for transportation which makes the profit for Transco.

To make a profit from end users you have to sign up to a retail company, or so they make you believe, as these companies have to be licenced to provide gas and electricity to the end users, but Transco has to also be licenced as they are a supplier to the big 6 and independents and the only UK supplier, so if you're currently signed up to Eon, EDF, British Gas, Scottish Power, or any gas provider it all comes from Transco which means they have the monopoly and as the big 6 are all owned by Centrica they also have a monopoly, and as Centrica also own Transco its one large monopoly with NIL competition.

When the gas enters your private or commercial property it is metered and the next scam appears, you have a standing charge and the various companies claim its for different things, I will tell you what they don't want you to know and that is ALL THE METERS ARE RENTED FROM A COMPANY CALLED SIEMENS and each of the suppliers rents them, so they receive a rental charge from Siemens which they pay, they then add their profits on and give you a component in your bill breakdown showing as the standing charge. If the individual companies bought the meters there would be no need for renting them and no need for you to pay a lifetimes worth of standing charges as a one off charge would suffice. This nice little meter scam adds £billions to their annual profits.

Part three of the scam is even more simple, when you look for your energy supplier and they sign you up do you know what you are actually signing up to? all you are doing is signing a contract with a supplier to say you will pay them at their rate for providing you with something that is already yours, its that simple. They are only ever paying Transco for transporting the gas, you sign a contract with them to allow you to pay them, and they can charge whatever rate they like for a product you already own.

So; how do you avoid paying? Transco can only sell to licenced energy suppliers and nobody else, so you remove their meters and buy your own, it really is that simple.

To do this legally you have to get a meter which you can buy for around £40-60 on sites such as Ebay and others, you now own the meter, its yours, so no standing charge. You get a gas safe registered engineer to install the gas meter as they have to fill in the appropriate certification; for electricity you get a suitably qualified electrical engineer to do the same and as you own both meters (keep the receipts) they have no equipment of theirs on your property which means they cannot even go to court for a warrant to enter your property to inspect their equipment which is what they currently try to do for unpaid bills so they can fit a pre-payment meter. In addition you write to them and give them 7 days to come and remove their equipment from your property or you will charge them a storage fee and state your fee per day; they don't come and collect it then you charge them and take them to the small claims court for non payment as prescribed in your lawful notice which you sent stating your storage fee.

You do need to send off your meter reading and you do this every 13 weeks but instead of sending it to a gas supplier you SEND IT DIRECTLY TO TRANSCO as now you don't have a gas supplier as you terminate your contract with them. 

Transco cannot bill you so you get no bill, remember they can only supply the big 6 and independent gas suppliers and not an unlicensed end user, and it applied to both gas and electricity.

[smshogun]

Just a note on records:

You must keep all records of both your equipment and readings, this is crucial.

If they try scamming you which they all do then you have proof of "deed of title" which is legal ownership of the meters which is crucial if they try to apply for a warrant of entry.

You have to keep a record of every meter reading, the actual reading, and the date it was taken, and the receipt for posting off the readings to Transco as you send them signed by mail (never use E-mail or fax or any other system) for delivery so someone has to sign for them when Transco receives your meter readings. They claim they haven't had them? piss off it was signed for on ********* by ********** and I have the receipt.

You are not guilty of any crime such as "abstraction of gas or electricity" because by sending them the readings every quarter you are giving them the opportunity to send you a bill, if they choose not to (because they can't) then its not your problem as by sending them readings

[John]

Is this using UCC?? I know a lot of people aren't familiar with UCC, but it's well worth reading the Code, by those who aren't familiar with UCC. I downloaded the whole code years back.
I've yet to find a person ask "what does ALL RIGHTS RESERVED" mean at the end of every movies titles. Just for the uninitiated UCC is the rules regarding CONTRACTS. Oh I hear, that leaves me out, I'm not in business so it doesn't apply to me...

WRONG, try your drivers license, tv license, mortgage, insurance policies....etc. ALL contracts. By signing your driving license, you have stated you will abide by ALL the conditions applied to it, seat belts, no operating a cell phone, no exceeding the speed limits, no drunk driving etc. AND you entered it voluntarily, no coercion.

UCC has it's origins in history, when you and I entered a contract we shook hands and trusted each others integrity to honour that hand shake, in fact in a dispute, the Judge would ask "did you shake on it".

But not everyone has integrity, so UCC was written, and now you have to sign a contract, but it's wise to enter after your signature "All rights reserved" to protact your butt.

It's not a matter of knowing the law, it's a matter of understanding how UCC works and how to protect yourself. That's the reason for "All rights reserved" All parts of a contract have to be written on the contract, if not...oh well, signing means you accept, all rights reserved means you only saw some of the agreed points and you reserve the right to use that in your defense, which is a VERY powerful defense.

[John]

Here's another point to muse over, when you have a delivery by a truck to your address, the trucker will give you a "Bill of lading" to sign..

Now hold on a minute, a "bill of lading" is what ships have to designate their cargo, not road transport..
Look it up in UCC, the whole UCC is on the internet, and makes some interesting reading!! (Uniform Commercial Code).

[smshogun]

No, its not UCC or UNIDROIT.

English Common Law dating back in some forms to pre Roman times, and the various gas acts.

[smshogun]

Its all based on maritime law, you give birth (berth) you sign ships articles (company is articles of incorporation) you have a registered company (a ships company of men) and there are many more.

Everything in life is consent or contract.

[smshogun]

Correct John, its all down to contract law.

As flesh and blood human beings we are bound by natural law which means all natural assets are ours, this is why the water falling from the sky is ours, the coal beneath the ground is ours, the gas beneath the sea is ours, etc, etc, etc.

This is why they have to introduce Acts and Statutes which is Government or man made laws, with any man made law you have consent of the governed to apply it and without consent they cannot apply it, they can also create something called "JOINDER" which is where they trick the flesh and blood human being into accepting liability for his legal fiction which is his corporate fiction, this is created by the birth certificate, so avoid contract, consent, or joinder then they can do Jack squat, diddly, as they cannot bind you to any contract.

They cannot take what is yours and sell it back to you, this is where the play on words and use indoctrination to get you to pay for something that you already own and as you have already highlighted many people are so indoctrinated and apathetic they blindly accept this without questioning it due to their indoctrination; question it and interpret what they are saying correctly and you don't enter a contract, avoidance being the key. You know the gas is a natural resource which you own so why pay for it? You collect rainwater in your water butt to water your garden and you aren't charged for it as you are merely collecting what you own, no contract, no consent, its yours so you're collecting it and storing it for your own future use. Similarly you install solar panels and collect another of your natural resources you own, sunlight, you turn it into energy in another form which is electricity and THEY PAY YOU for collecting that natural resource you own and turning it into electricity for them to sell for a profit, hence the feed in tariff set higher than the normal tariffs they charge the end user, you're providing them as a for profit electricity distributor and they pay you a profit for providing them with this service.

Similarly; they play on words to make you believe something which isn't necessarily true or is only partially true in an attempt to deceive you into entering a contract and paying them. Take water companies, you aren't paying for water and they actually tell you this if you listen to their arguments; "we clean and process the water" did I ask you to do this? "we take away your sewage and make it safe" did you ask them to? remember your parents and grandparents paid for and installed all these grids, so when they say "we have to install and maintain the grid" its a partial truth. In reality they play on words actually tells you all you need to know as the water mains coming to your home were paid for by your forefathers.

This is why they use a play on words and indoctrination, they hope to trick you into either consent or contract to pay them for something you don't necessarily want or need and apply additional processes to convince you of this fact.

Its all B/S because the distributors to the end users have already paid the company for transportation of water, gas, or electricity so why do you need to pay for it again, double dipping at its finest.

ACC is nothing other than a platform for harmony of legislation around the world which uses a set of differentials to equalise differential between differing legislation; UK, USA, Canada, Australia, Jamaica, and all other Common Law jurisdictions operate under common law, yet a republic such as France or Spain are republics and UCC sets in place operational conditions to allow similarity or equality to counter the differences within these systems through a standardisation, which is why it is particularly powerful as its multi-jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional at the same time. 

 

[John]

Several years back when I was researching freedom, the US Constitution and how laws applied this side of the pond, I found out that ALL laws had to be written for the "common man" to understand. Basically a law could be "void for vagueness" So, all laws had to have a full list of definitions of all so called "vague" words.
Even words like "person" have to be defined, mostly because Lawyers write laws in what is termed "word art".

I'll give an instance of this from out tax code, better known as Title 26 United States Code. First, the code is that, a code, to find out who the codes apply to, and there are 50 volumes ranging from transportation, to the military, but Title 26 is taxes, a person has to read the regulations, in my case Title 26 Code of Federal Regulations.
An eyeopener to say the least!!

But what does the definition of state's mean, obviously most think it means the "several states" Now here's word art in play, "they" use State very often instead of "state.. No different would be the man on the street would say...Oh how wrong they are.
"State" is a "corporation" whereas state is one of the 50 states, usually referred to as the "several states"
Most over here don't know they live in a country named America, better known as The united states of America, not the lower case "u" and "s". Actually, the Supreme Court in a decision, stated there are THREE definitions of the United States of America, note the capitalization of "U" and "S".
I won't go any further on that, it's easy to find out those definitions via Google.

Back to "states" states are the 50 states, "States" is the District of Columbia, Guam, American Virgin Islands etc.

I like the definitions of Employer and Employee best, An Employer is the federal government, a political party or subdivision, and an Employee is a person who works for those...
My wife is has a BSc in business, she majored in accounting, and when I was learning tax law, I pointed these things out to her, after all she is an accountant by profession. She'd never been taught anything regarding how to read code and where to find the regulations, nor ANYTHING about definitions!!!

Also I hear so many people saying "It's time to simplify the tax code" Hell, if they removed ALL the excise tax law out of Title 26 and moved it to Title 27 where it belongs, Title 26 would be just a thin book of a few hundred pages.
See a picture here?? Why on earth did they lump oil, natural gas, rail road etc taxes in with income taxes?? Instead of inside the correct excise tax book, aka Title 27.

Now on looking for the penalties our IRS imposes on us if we fail to file, not only myself, but hundreds of thousands of others have looked for them. You know??? They don't exist under "income taxes".

A quick search of the regulations of Title 26, and no penalties can be found!!! I did my own research instead of relying on others, and found ALL penalties that our IRS apply to us under income taxes to be in Title 27 Code of Federal Regulations...AKA alcohol and tobacco!!
Failure to file is under the "stamp acts" So in essence, when we file our taxes, we are declaring we are filing excise duty on the wine/beer/spirits/tobacco or firearms we are supposed to be making.
Not only that, but the 1040 prescribed tax return form is a "bogus" form. ALL forms required by government for purposes of information gathering, have to have a valid OMB number printed on them, the one for the 1040 doesn't have a valid OMB number required by law!! I again did my own research, and no, it's not a valid number for that form.

It gets deeper, the IRS is not even a federal government agency, but a collecting agency of the Federal Reserve Bank.

I'll leave it at that, as it get's very involved with legal issues regarding government emblems and department names.

[eleceng]

Reading back on all the posts regarding common law, I was wondering if any could be used in the cases of armed forces personnel & armed police accused of murder??

[colly0410]

Jan 9, 2016 9:05:13 GMT -5 eleceng said:

Reading back on all the posts regarding common law, I was wondering if any could be used in the cases of armed forces personnel & armed police accused of murder??

When I was in the army we were told in we didn't apply the Geneva convention re captured enemy, then we could be charged with theft, assault, GBH, manslaughter or murder, in that order. I never saw any action (except punch-up's in the pub, usually with the Scottish regt's) as we didn't have any enemies back then..

[smshogun]

Yes, you avoid a criminal action totally and use something called a "Tort" which is a civil action taken under Common Law and will avoid a magistrates or crown court as these are a private company and are only in it for the money, it will be scheduled for a hearing in a High Court, either Queens Bench or Chancery division and held in your local county court.